Rostec returns to sale the MTs-255 revolving hunting rifle

How expensive is it in numbers? It was possible to make a massive, simpler, and cheaper version, the same weapon!

Extraction can still.

I have never even heard or imagined the existence of such!
I thought V.O.Shpakovsky wrote about the latest revolving guns!

The barrel must be moved under the lower chamber.

The first MTs-255 guns were produced by TsKIB since 1993 and not from the beginning of 2000. The gun is interesting, there are both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages include a good balance of the gun, the disadvantages - the difficulty of reloading.

Hunting is now a very expensive pleasure, for that kind of money it is easier to hire a killer.

I wonder if the trigger is single or self-cocking?
Rouge - large revolver

A controversial commercial project, and also expensive, the Tula in the field of hunting weapons outright lose to Izhevsk, they make more budgetary weapons, and the quality has been improved recently, I myself have 27 Izh in plastic manufactured in 2006

Since when does Rostec decide something, in fact, this is the prerogative of the Duma. And it's high time to stop making potential criminals out of us.

Ideally, this should be a rifled carbine for survival or hunting in difficult conditions of expeditions, stations, etc.
Many years ago, discussing him with a guru who traveled not only our country up and down, I heard his vision, with experience I myself came to the same opinion.

Based on our realities, it should be a 5,6mm rifled carbine. For shooting both with a 5,6x39 cartridge and when replacing the drum, the possibility of firing with a 5,6mm cartridge with rimfire (side fight). Stainless steel, forend and stock are either plywood or plastic.

The revolving scheme is advantageous here, as it gives bicaliberity by changing the drum, in addition, unlike a carbine with a longitudinally sliding bolt (bolt), it does not require the shooter to have great skills to produce several relatively aimed shots in a stressful situation.

It is easier to carry with you (or supply) a large number of 5,6mm "small" cartridges, which are much lighter and cheaper than shot cartridges, and in difficult conditions they allow you to get all small and medium game, plus a certain amount of 5,6x39mm cartridges giving a long firing range, and having great slaughter.

For purely amateur hunting - only if for a change. Well, maybe the fishermen will like it if it does not weigh as much as a tank.
And the amateur - people with smooth-bore Saiga hunt, although it is clear that when you see someone with this freak in their hands instead of a RIFLE, you just want to either drive away, or break this "piece of iron" about him.

Well so so pleasure I would not buy for practical purposes. A classic 12x76 vertical rod (type IZH-27), always with two triggers and a disabled automatic safety device, an ejector or extractor (the master's business) is the best choice.

Are you a theoretician barely sliding off the couch or a hunter and owner of, for example, IZH / MR-94 North of calibers 5,6x39 / 20 from which it is tolerable to shoot using inserts, 5,6mm rimfire cartridges, is it .22lr, and .22WMR? .. ...

Sir, thanks to you and your kind, this site is depreciating more and more ...
The principle "you don't know - ask / don't know - keep quiet" does not work at all, from the word at all. Moreover, this is not even a question of respect for others, but a problem of self-respect for many.

Well, they are bought on the secondary market. And since people hawala what not?

No, a combined shotgun weapon is not the best choice due to the mass of the shot cartridge.
In the photo that you have - MP-94 Taiga, there is also a variant of the fitting, a trust with two rifled barrels. The combination of .22lr and 7,62x54 calibers would be ideal for mining and defending against everything in our country.
It would be just as great a survivalist weapon. But here the problem of the quality of our hunting weapons intervenes. If we talk about fittings and combined weapons - put out the light ...

Excellent self-shooting rifles. In every normal middle-class home, there should be such a gun, already equipped, on the carpet. Dad for good luck, children for fun.

I do not understand why. So. You want a rechargeable shotgun. Okay. Let's say you don't want self-charging, since those will be more expensive. Clear. Why shotguns don't suit you - pump action (as the Americans love) or shotguns with a henry staple (which are now returning to the market). A revolver-type shotgun is initially limited in ammunition - the drum is not rubber, but pump-action shotguns are available for 10 charges (if the grenade is lengthened). At the same time, neither a pomopovik nor a "rocking chair" with a henry bracket is needed to synchronize the revolver's shotgun with such precision in machining parts. That is, you make a shotgun that is limited in ammunition, more expensive to manufacture than a pumpgun, while it does not have a self-loading rate of fire. Question - WHAT'S NAFIGA? SHOB BOOLO? Several people who have more dough than common sense will certainly buy this. But a normal hunter or an amateur shooter will buy either a self-loading, or a pump, or a lever. Moreover, there are, or rather were, bolt-action shotguns. This will also be easier and cheaper to manufacture than a "revolving shotgun". Attention is the question, but how is the manufacturer going to solve the problem when the cartridges themselves detonate from overheating and the shooter receives a buckshot charge in his left hand (and loses it)? These were the problems faced by American designers of revolving rifles and shotguns in the 19th century. Metal sleeves transfer heat very well and heat up very quickly. Pictured below is a Sears shotgun. Magazine 6 + 1 (it is possible to lengthen the magazine / grenade launcher by 3-4 rounds). Barrel length 24 inches, caliber 12. Now these have been abandoned, pump guns are the same in price, but have a higher rate of fire. Sliding rotary bolt shotguns, though, are more durable and more accurate (with slug fired).
https://images.guns.com/prod/2021/02/26/60396f32c637f51da2e15a975014593c2c9c379df354d.jpeg?imwidth=900

Henry staple shotguns were produced in the USA, then in China and imported into the USA until the late 80s. Now the Turkish companies Adler and Pardus produce shotguns with a henry staple. The Americans produced shotguns with a henry staple even in 10 caliber. So the henry staple is strong enough to handle the loads of heavy-duty cartridges.
I am NOT a shotgun lover. But personally, I like Henry's staple shotguns more than pump guns. It's just more convenient. For me, the Model PW87 Norinko is more comfortable than the Mossberg pump. If the Mossberg is shaken, it makes a little noise, but Norinko does not. And when reloading, the sight is lost less.

From Oster I remembered:
"Ask them in detail, why are they upset?
But at the same time reducing the speed is absolutely useless. "
:)

I was waiting for the topic of hunting weapons. Can you tell us about modern hunting rifles (semi-automatic or manual) chambered for the Russian cartridge 7,62x54 ???